Introduction
On August 8, 2025, the Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR filed against Kumar Mangat Pathak, the producer of Drishyam 2, amid an ongoing fraud probe concerning the film’s overseas distribution rights. Justice Neena Krishna Bansal stated that judicial intervention was premature since the investigation is still underway and Pathak is cooperating.
The Fraud Allegations
The Economic Offences Wing of Delhi Police filed the FIR in June 2025, accusing Pathak and associates of cheating a businessman out of ₹4.3 crore by fraudulently offering exclusive Chinese-language distribution rights for Drishyam 2 covering China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Allegations include conspiracy and forgery.
Middleman’s Role in the Disputed Deal
The complainant alleged he was contacted by Bharat Sevak, who claimed to represent Panorama Studios. Sevak purportedly arranged the deal and claimed to have transferred ₹15.75 crore of the ₹16.40 crore total. Panorama Studios denied receiving the funds and noted Sevak’s authorization had expired.
Court’s Decision and Producer’s Argument
Pathak’s counsel argued the issue was commercial and not criminal, highlighting Pathak’s cooperation and ongoing pursuit of alternative remedies. Despite this, the Delhi High Court refused to dismiss the FIR or stay investigation.
Conclusion
The Delhi HC’s ruling underlines the judiciary’s intent to allow investigations in high-value fraud cases in the film industry to proceed unhindered.
