Amber Heard and Johnny Depp in court docket on Could 16, 2022 amid their defamation trial. (Photograph: Getty Photos)

Amber Heard sparred with Johnny Depp’s lawyer as cross-examination received underway on Monday afternoon. The 36-year-old actress appeared particularly bothered when the subject of her $7 million divorce settlement was introduced up, which was by no means donated in full to charity as promised. Heard was additionally grilled about not searching for medical remedy after Depp’s quite a few alleged assaults.

Depp’s lawyer, Camille Vasquez, kicked issues off by asking Heard: “Mr. Depp hasn’t checked out you as soon as this complete trial, has he?”

“Not that I’ve observed, no,” the Aquaman star replied.

“You’ve got checked out him although many occasions, have not you?” Vasquez stated.

“Sure I’ve,” Heard responded.

“You realize precisely why Mr. Depp will not look again at you, do not you?” Vasquez requested. “He promised you’d by no means see his eyes once more, is not that true?”

In July 2016, two months after Heard filed for a short lived restraining order, she organized to satisfy with Depp in San Francisco. The pair’s former agent testified at trial it was as a result of the actress wished to get again along with Depp, one thing she denied earlier on Monday. (“I wished to reduce the animosity, I wished to reconcile in that manner. I did not need to get again along with him.”)

An audio recording from the assembly was performed to the jury wherein Depp tells Heard from then on, “We wont should see one another once more. … You’ll not see my eyes once more.”

Vasquez stated to Heard, “He stored that promise, hasn’t he?”

“So far as I do know, he can not have a look at me,” Heard replied.

“He will not have a look at you, proper Ms. Heard?” Vasquez stated.

“He cannot,” Heard shot again.

The strain did not ease from there. Heard was proven images from a number of occasions from 2014 to 2015 wherein she seems unhurt, hours or days after alleged violent incidents with Depp.

After the 2014 Met Gala, Heard testified that Depp hit her so laborious she thought he broke her nostril. Heard did not search medical remedy and went to Spike TV’s Don Rickles: One Night time Solely occasion the next evening with Depp.

When requested if she sought medical remedy after what she alleges was a three-day hostage state of affairs in Australia in March 2015, Heard replied: “I didn’t search medical remedy after Australia, no.”

“Not for the rape?” Vasquez requested.

Heard, who flinched on the phrase, replied, “No I did not inform anybody.” The actress testified earlier this month that Depp penetrated her with a liquor bottle and that she bled afterwards.

Depp agreed to pay Heard $7 million after they settled their divorce in 2016. The cash got here in installments however was absolutely paid in February 2018. The court docket was proven a clip of Heard on a chat present in October 2018 saying she donated the whole settlement to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Kids’s Hospital of Los Angeles as a result of she “wished nothing” from her ex-husband.

“I’ve not been capable of fulfill these obligations but,” Heard admitted underneath oath.

Earlier on Monday, Heard stated throughout direct examination she was unable to satisfy her pledge of $3.5 million to every charity “as a result of Johnny sued me for $50 million.” Nonetheless, Vasquez famous that Heard had the complete settlement for 13 months earlier than she was sued by Depp over her 2018 op-ed within the Washington Submit. Vasquez urged that Heard “wished Mr. Depp’s cash” and that she solely vowed to donate for good press.

“You wished to be seen … as a noble sufferer of home violence,” Vasquez stated.

Heard fired again, “I’ve by no means, by no means wished to be seen as a sufferer. Nor have I ever referred to as myself one.”

Vasquez stated Heard lied underneath oath within the U.Ok. trial as she testified “the whole thing of my divorce settlement was donated to charity.” This prompted a forwards and backwards in regards to the distinction between the phrases “pledge” and “donation” as Heard stated she pledged the cash to charity, which she nonetheless intends to satisfy.

“I take advantage of ‘pledge’ and ‘donation’ synonymously,” Heard testified.

“I do not,” Vasquez replied, earlier than noting how “a lot of the cash” that has been donated to ACLU and CHLA in Heard’s identify is just not from the actress, however quite Elon Musk.

“I consider Elon made a donation in my honor in one of many years,” Heard confirmed, sustaining the Tesla CEO’s contribution did “not depend in direction of my pledge.”

Earlier on Monday, Heard testified that Musk donated $500,000 to every charity “in my honor.”

“Elon, who was my boyfriend on the time, had his personal charitable contributions that he made,” she advised the court docket. Heard related with Musk on the 2016 Met Gala weeks earlier than submitting for divorce.

“I did not acknowledge [Elon] till we began speaking [on the red carpet] and he jogged my memory we had met as soon as earlier than,” she advised the court docket.

Heard “ended up going on my own” to the Met Gala as she and Depp weren’t on talking phrases from their struggle on her thirtieth birthday in April 2016.

“I sat subsequent to an empty place setting for Johnny that they cleared as quickly as we realized he successfully stood me up on the purple carpet,” Heard declared.

As for Musk, the actress stated the entrepreneur “appeared like an actual gentleman.”

“He was very nice. He sat at a close-by desk and we received to talking that evening and ultimately turned associates,” she added.

Heard’s crew issued the next assertion forward of cross-examination:

There’s an previous saying by trial attorneys: when the information are in your aspect, argue the information. When the information are usually not in your aspect, pound away on the rostrum. As we speak, we anticipate Depp’s attorneys will as a substitute pound away on the sufferer. We concern will probably be equal components shameful and determined. And, the overwhelming proof — the reality — is just not on Depp’s aspect.

The one factor we suspect Depp’s attorneys will keep away from is the central subject of this trial: does Amber or any girl have the First Modification Proper of Freedom of Speech.

MORE: Amber Heard claims Johnny Depp “kicked me within the again” over James Franco jealousy



Source link

Share.

Leave A Reply

Exit mobile version