8.
“When wealthy businessmen/entrepreneurs declare that not paying their fair proportion of taxes helps them spend money on their neighborhood and supply jobs. Everybody ought to pay PERIOD.”
—u/medusamagpie
“Bezos is not making Amazon if poor individuals do not fund the constructing of roads and bridges for him to ship packages. Or if we did not construct the web for him to promote these packages. Or if we did not fund public schooling to coach an in a position workforce to construct the corporate for him. Or if we did not pay cops to cease individuals from punking him out of his inheritance.
The wealthy profit disproportionately from what taxes fund, and they need to be made to pay disproportionately into the tax base after they get richer. To not ‘punish’ their success, however to allow it.”
—u/franky_emm
“‘For those who lower company taxes they’ll rent extra individuals.’ By no means works. Why rent extra individuals than you want?”
—u/Common-Play-5085
“The rich are already spending what they need to spend. You solely want so many homes, vehicles and so on…Giving more cash to the rich within the type of tax cuts, subsidies and so on., solely causes a rise in wealth disparity, as we have seen taking place since about 1980.
Similar with companies. Massive companies are already at some extent of equilibrium relating to assembly the demand of their clients. Giving more cash to large companies is not going to trigger them to increase and/or improve compensation to their staff (lol, who ever fucking believed they might do this?) They’re going to improve pay to the house owners/traders/shareholders and so on. They’re going to manipulate the market to their benefit by way of inventory buybacks which have been made authorized proper across the time Reagan had begun implementing his ‘trickle down’ financial insurance policies. I am certain that was only a coincidence tho, proper?”
—u/postSpectral
