Sean “Diddy” Combs’ authorized crew has filed a movement to dismiss claims in a lawsuit accusing him of sexually assaulting a lady in 1991.
RELATED: Stevie J. Shares Viral Video Of “What A Actual Diddy Celebration Seems to be Like” (WATCH)
Extra Particulars Concerning Diddy’s Reported Response To The Sexual Assault Lawsuit
In response to AP Information, Combs’ authorized crew filed the movement on Friday, April 26. The music mogul’s authorized crew is reportedly asserting that Diddy can’t be sued for explicit claims within the lawsuit as a result of “sure legal guidelines didn’t exist” when the incidents allegedly occurred in 1991.
Diddy’s authorized crew is reportedly asking for Joi Dickerson-Neal’s claims about “revenge porn and human trafficking” to be “dismissed with prejudice.”
CNN notes that Combs’ attorneys are persevering with to label Dickerson-Neal’s allegations “false, offensive, and salacious.” Moreover, Diddy’s attorneys are reportedly asking that “allegations in opposition to Combs’ firm” be dismissed as nicely. To notice, TMZ stories that the request refers to Diddy’s firms, “Unhealthy Boy Information or Unhealthy Boy Leisure.”
Nevertheless, TMZ notes that Diddy’s crew has not filed to dismiss the primary “two counts” within the lawsuit. These claims allege Combs inflicted “assault,” battery, and “intentional infliction of emotional misery” on the plaintiff.
Extra Particulars Concerning The Lawsuit & Allegations
As The Shade Room beforehand reported, Dickerson-Neal filed the go well with in opposition to Combs in November 2023. Moreover, the go well with was reportedly filed below New York’s Grownup Survivors Act.
On the time, it was reported that Dickerson-Neal accused Diddy of sexually assaulting her after a date in 1991. Diddy allegedly gave the lady a drug. Then, allegedly sexually assaulted her at a music studio.
In response to AP Information, the lady accused Combs of recording the assault. Moreover, she alleged he shared the footage with associates.
In an preliminary response to the lawsuit, a spokesperson for the mogul reportedly denied the allegations. Moreover, they labeled the claims a “cash seize.”
“This last-minute lawsuit is an instance of how a well-intentioned legislation might be turned on its head. Ms. Dickerson’s 32-year-old story is made up and never credible. Mr. Combs by no means assaulted her, and he or she implicates firms that didn’t exist. That is purely a cash seize and nothing extra,” their assertion learn, per New York Publish.
